This has me puzzled. President Obama is visiting the Arab world this week, speaking in Cairo, to "repair" America's image in the Arab/Muslim world.
Shouldn't it be the other way around?
Aren't the Saudi's whom Obama made his first visit to, the ones spending billions of dollars exporting radical Islam known as "Wahabism" around the world?
Aren't the Muslims the ones threatening world domination to replace Judaism and Christianity with (radical) Islam?
Who was it that beheaded Daniel Pearl? American mercenaries or radical Muslims?
Which culture condones beheadings, public stoning, forced marriage, torture, honor killings, suicide bombings, suppressing minorities and women? American (culture) or Arabic / Muslim?
Yet it is an American president who thinks a US public relations tour is in order?
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Monday, May 4, 2009
Obama administration ready to abandon Israel
I have frequently stated that the two greatest threats to Israel are radical/ideological Islamists and powerful Jewish liberals. I laughed at my Jewish friends who "assured" me that Israel would be safe during an Obama administration because his chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, a Jew with strong connections to Israel, would serve as "gatekeeper."
According to the Jerusalem Post, Thwarting Iran's nuclear program is conditional on progress in peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, according to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
In other words, Israel has to give in to Palestinian terrorists or the US will not support Israel in its attempts to prevent Iran from gaining the weapons it will surely use to threaten Israel's existence.
According to the Jerusalem Post, Thwarting Iran's nuclear program is conditional on progress in peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, according to White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.
In other words, Israel has to give in to Palestinian terrorists or the US will not support Israel in its attempts to prevent Iran from gaining the weapons it will surely use to threaten Israel's existence.
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Barack Obama's new "Morality"
With the revocation of the Bush administrations justice departments interrogation techniques, Barack Obama declared that "America has regained it's moral standing around the world."
How is that now?
By handcuffing the CIA's ability to extract information from blood-thirsty killers about impending mass murder attacks against American civilians, somehow, this is "moral?"
Who's approval is Obama seeking that he declares his policies more "moral" than that of his predecessor?
Does Obama think his new morality play will place us in a more favorbale light with Europe? If so, how will things from here on in benefit us? Will Europe now join us in the "war on terror?" Will they send more troops to help the US in Afghanistan?
Don't exert too much brain power on these questions. The answer is no.
And while we are allowing Barak Obama to redefine what America's morals are, I have a few questions for him:
Is it moral to put the squeeze on Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, to make concessions that risk its very survival to a terrorist people?
(I hope attendees at this weeks AIPAC convention will ask that question to Democrat officials professing their support for Israel)
Does Barack Obama feel America has regained its "moral leadership" by supporting abortion at any stage, 24/7, on healthy viable babies?
Does Barack Obama feel we have regained our "moral leadership" by supporting same sex marriage?
Does Barack Obama feel superior by pitting Americans against one another by demonizing executives in the corporate world?
Or Does Barak Obama believe that America's "morality" is defined by weakening our security, leaving this country's citizens vulnerable to more terrorist attacks so that the rest of the world will love us?
How is that now?
By handcuffing the CIA's ability to extract information from blood-thirsty killers about impending mass murder attacks against American civilians, somehow, this is "moral?"
Who's approval is Obama seeking that he declares his policies more "moral" than that of his predecessor?
Does Obama think his new morality play will place us in a more favorbale light with Europe? If so, how will things from here on in benefit us? Will Europe now join us in the "war on terror?" Will they send more troops to help the US in Afghanistan?
Don't exert too much brain power on these questions. The answer is no.
And while we are allowing Barak Obama to redefine what America's morals are, I have a few questions for him:
Is it moral to put the squeeze on Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, to make concessions that risk its very survival to a terrorist people?
(I hope attendees at this weeks AIPAC convention will ask that question to Democrat officials professing their support for Israel)
Does Barack Obama feel America has regained its "moral leadership" by supporting abortion at any stage, 24/7, on healthy viable babies?
Does Barack Obama feel we have regained our "moral leadership" by supporting same sex marriage?
Does Barack Obama feel superior by pitting Americans against one another by demonizing executives in the corporate world?
Or Does Barak Obama believe that America's "morality" is defined by weakening our security, leaving this country's citizens vulnerable to more terrorist attacks so that the rest of the world will love us?
Friday, May 1, 2009
Profile of an American Who Can't Think for himself
Like many Americans, I have my points of view and ideoligical outlook, but I would never give anybody, especially an elected official, a blank check to do whatever he/she wants.
But then I came across an interview with singer Tony Bennett, a man whom I thought had a slight degree of intellect and self respect. Someone who had the ability to think for himself. But I was wrong.
Grammy-award winning musician Tony Bennett told CNSNews.com he “loves everything” Barack Obama has done in his first 100 days as president and thinks every American should “give him all-out support for anything he wants to do.” Bennett further said that Americans should imitate the other countries of the world that support Obama. “I really hope that every citizen of the United States would imitate the rest of the world because they’re all for Obama,” said Bennett. “Every other country adores what happened – in our great country – to have him as president.”
But then I came across an interview with singer Tony Bennett, a man whom I thought had a slight degree of intellect and self respect. Someone who had the ability to think for himself. But I was wrong.
Grammy-award winning musician Tony Bennett told CNSNews.com he “loves everything” Barack Obama has done in his first 100 days as president and thinks every American should “give him all-out support for anything he wants to do.” Bennett further said that Americans should imitate the other countries of the world that support Obama. “I really hope that every citizen of the United States would imitate the rest of the world because they’re all for Obama,” said Bennett. “Every other country adores what happened – in our great country – to have him as president.”
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Obama and Clinton blackmail Israel .....
Never has Israel ever faced the kind of threats to its survival as she is today.
On the one hand, Iran is threatening to attack Israel with nuclear weapons and on the other side we have Hamas sitting on Israels border attacking daily with rockets smuggeld in from other countries, including Iran.
Now the Obama administration is threatening the Netanyahu government that unless they are willing to support a two state solution which means having a terror state on its border, Israel will not be able to count on international support, including US support (remember that at the AIPAC conference in 2 weeks) in her possible preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.
From Hillary Clinton:
"For Israel to get the kind of strong support it is looking for vis-a-vis Iran, it can't stay on the sidelines with respect to the Palestinians and the peace efforts. They go hand in hand," she told the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee
On the one hand, Iran is threatening to attack Israel with nuclear weapons and on the other side we have Hamas sitting on Israels border attacking daily with rockets smuggeld in from other countries, including Iran.
Now the Obama administration is threatening the Netanyahu government that unless they are willing to support a two state solution which means having a terror state on its border, Israel will not be able to count on international support, including US support (remember that at the AIPAC conference in 2 weeks) in her possible preemptive strike against Iran's nuclear facilities.
From Hillary Clinton:
"For Israel to get the kind of strong support it is looking for vis-a-vis Iran, it can't stay on the sidelines with respect to the Palestinians and the peace efforts. They go hand in hand," she told the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee
Friday, April 3, 2009
Israel has been warned
As Barack Obama concludes his adulationfest with Europe, he leaves no doubt in anyones mind what his plans are for Israel. By telling our "allies" (who can't stand us) that America, has in the past, been arrogant, dismissive, derisive in our realtionship with the Europeans, he is signalling a new day in US/EUrelations.
The problem is that the main thrust between our strained relations has been our stance on Israel versus the European position. Europe is rife with anti-semitism and pro-Arabism. With the exception of Great Britain, which also harbors antipathy towards Israel, the EU has actively worked against our interests, "remember the war on terror?" And why? Because the EU resents our taking the lead in any anti Arab war unless it includes provisions to address the Palestinian issue. In fact, the EU has consistantly acted against the US in the United nations whenever there were votes to condemn Israel.
By promising to be more respectful of Europe and to enhance our relations with them, Obama has in essence, promised that Israel will no longer be able to count on US support the way it has in the past.
Yes to terrorism and radical Islam, No to Israel, the ONLY democracy in the Middle East.
If Barack Obama can fire the CEO of GM, don't think that he doesn't believe he can force Netanyahu's hand either.
Israel, you have been warned.
The problem is that the main thrust between our strained relations has been our stance on Israel versus the European position. Europe is rife with anti-semitism and pro-Arabism. With the exception of Great Britain, which also harbors antipathy towards Israel, the EU has actively worked against our interests, "remember the war on terror?" And why? Because the EU resents our taking the lead in any anti Arab war unless it includes provisions to address the Palestinian issue. In fact, the EU has consistantly acted against the US in the United nations whenever there were votes to condemn Israel.
By promising to be more respectful of Europe and to enhance our relations with them, Obama has in essence, promised that Israel will no longer be able to count on US support the way it has in the past.
Yes to terrorism and radical Islam, No to Israel, the ONLY democracy in the Middle East.
If Barack Obama can fire the CEO of GM, don't think that he doesn't believe he can force Netanyahu's hand either.
Israel, you have been warned.
Friday, March 27, 2009
I can't believe what Obama is planning to do next
I am watching Fox News and my jaw is on the ground. Neil Cavuto is interviewing an "activist" who is supporting a new bill being proposed in Congress giving ILLEGAL ALIENS in - state tuition costs for college, and in the next segment I see that the United Nations is proposing "wealth redistribution" under the guise of combating global energy reform.
In the next segment, I am reading on the chyron (floating screen at the bottom), that the Intelligence director is hinting or considering giving welfare benefits to former Gitmo detainees. Please tell me that I'm really sleeping and that all of this is a nightmare.
This administration must be stopped, and the Pelosi/Reid Congress must be defeated in 2010, otherwise we will get what we deserve.
In the next segment, I am reading on the chyron (floating screen at the bottom), that the Intelligence director is hinting or considering giving welfare benefits to former Gitmo detainees. Please tell me that I'm really sleeping and that all of this is a nightmare.
This administration must be stopped, and the Pelosi/Reid Congress must be defeated in 2010, otherwise we will get what we deserve.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)